I have declared a goal to finish two novels (we’re talking rough, rough drafts here) in six months. (Knowing me, editing them will then take three years.) One, my Nanowrimo novel, is already done. That gives me until the end of April to finish the second, by my calculations.
My friends have been glowering at me for my productivity, but, really, it’s renewed productivity after three or so years of being too burnt out to write. I’m enjoying writing again, and that’s a good thing.
I like to describe my Nanowrimo novel, Hollins Hill, as what Jane Austen might have written if she had been dropped on her head (repeatedly) as a small child and also came to recognize ghosts and sex. However, that might still be giving myself too much credit. It is, broadly speaking, a ‘historical paranormal romance.’ Set in 1802, in an estate called (surprise!) Hollins Hill, in the north of England, it is about the estate’s residents, the Hackham family. In his push to have a son, Sir George Hackham managed to sire fourteen daughters (by four different wives). Luckily for the readers (and the writer), only the eldest five are really characters in their own right. In the remoteness of Hollins Hill, an estate where the house is haunted benevolently by a spirit known affectionately as Dorothy, the wood is haunted rather more malevolently by nameless spirits, and the ruins of an ancient abbey on the estate may or may not contain a magical relic with the power of healing. But when a young (and rather married) poet arrives in search of said relic and falls hopelessly in love with one of the sisters, he brings the outside world crashing in on Hollins Hill with all sorts of complications and tragedies ensuing.
I’m still not sure if Hollins Hill is any good. I printed it off recently to have a hard copy to edit, and reread snippets of it, which were better than I remembered but also often read rather more frivolously than I intended. I also know sections of it have some major structural issues that will take a while to fix. That said, I do know it was an absolute blast to write. It helped me recover my love of writing, which had wandered off somewhere in the last few years and gotten lost. I was also astonished by the fact that although I have always found male character more difficult to write (and to RP, for that matter), the voice of Roger — the irresponsible, impulsive, scattered and occasionally lecherous aforementioned poet — came so naturally to me it was almost disturbing.
After I finished the first draft of Hollins Hill, in early December, I spent some time playing around with a proposed sequel for it, New World. The characters were still so alive in my head I wanted to continue their story. However, I put it away for a bit because it wasn’t yet clear enough to me. Writing Hollins Hill in a ‘I’ll write and see what happens’ approach worked, because I had to tie all storylines into the location. New World, given the Hackham girls were expelled from Hollins Hill and were now all over the place, was going to be an absolute mess if I tackled it that way. So now it’s percolating at the back of my mind, waiting to be revisited when I have a better idea of how to structure it.
In late January, desperately in need of an ongoing project to hold my own in the Word Challenge, I started a novel tentatively entitled When The Bough Breaks. It was almost deserted in the early days, especially after I initially wrote the first chapter in third person, and then went back and re-wrote it in first. (First person won out). Now, however, I’m past the halfway mark and cannot see myself not finishing it.
WTBB is both a little more fantasy-oriented and a little more character-oriented than Hollins Hill. It has more a firm foot in the supernatural (in this case, faeries), and because it’s intended to be about the same length as Hollins Hill, but with far fewer characters, the characters are more rounded. In theory. If Hollins Hill is a really mangled re-imagining of Pride & Prejudice, WTBB is what happens when you do a similar hack-job to Jane Eyre. It is about Dora, a young woman who has lived a sheltered and reclusive life, but when her father dies, is forced to go out into the world as a governess, traveling to Scotland to teach a baron’s younger sister. However, she discovers her pupil has a tail, which is only the first sign of weirdness. The gate to Faerie, she learns, was shut and it can be unlocked only by the death of the young girl she teaches. Everyone in the household seems to have a different agenda and, alone and confused, she has no idea who to trust or how to save her pupil.
WTBB is set in a later era (1869) than Hollins Hill, but the two books are actually connected, albeit in a way that is so far only in my head. I suppose, thematically, they have similarities as well. They are both about growing up, leaving your safe place behind, and learning to deal with life. They play with the tension between what is real and practical, and what is intangible and ideal. To an extent, too, they’re both about family, but in different ways. The Hackham girls, even as they’re expelled from their family home, will always have each other, and thus will probably turn out fine. Even though they might disagree with each other’s actions, they will always be there to catch one who falls. Dora, however, is completely alone and lost in an uncertain world, brushing up against others in the same situation, who don’t know whether to shun strangers or grab hold of them. She reflects, early on, if she disappeared, no one would miss her. As at least three characters have asked in that book so far, when asked why they remain in this situation, “Where else would I go?”
That is, I suppose, why I keep thinking of WTBB as a very dark book, and Hollins Hill more as a comedy-drama.